It Lives Inside

Unfortunately, we couldn’t find any streaming offers for It Lives Inside.

It opens with a normal view of a camera panning through a modest but dilapidated house. Dead, mangled bodies are scattered throughout the residence’s hallways. An open basement door is letting forth screams. We descend rickety steps to a body that has been burned so intensely that steam is still coming from the flesh covered in charcoal. Its hand is extended toward a glass jar that is filled with dark smoke. This jar serves only as a vessel, a symbol for the challenges experienced by the Indian residents of this white suburb.

To tell the tale of Samidha (a compelling Megan Suri), Bishal Dutta’s feature-length directorial debut, “It Lives Inside,” uses formulaic atmospheric frights and cultural mythology. Samidha, sometimes known as Sam, is a brilliant and well-liked student who embodies the stereotype of the average adolescent with a controlling mother (Neeru Bajwa) and a crush on the popular kid (Gage Marsh) at school found in these movies. Tamira (Mohana Krishnan), who used to be her best friend, is currently suffering through it. She carries the same glass jar we saw previously while sleep-deprived and babbling to herself.

She approaches Sam and asks her to speak with Tamira because her instructor Joyce (Betty Gabriel) is alarmed by it sufficiently. Sam, regrettably, refuses Joyce’s requests to associate with the “crazy” Brown guy since he doesn’t want to.

She also disregards Tamira’s account of a ghostly presence troubling her. Until she unintentionally breaks the jar, Sam doesn’t believe her pal. Sam dreams of a ghoul with an unsettlingly constructed head made of tiny fangs that starts biting everyone around her when Tamira inexplicably vanishes. What comes next tries to be both an adolescent film and a metaphor for the experience of immigrants, but it never quite comes together.

Many people will draw comparisons between the Pishach, the movie’s monster, and “The Babadook.” Both entities exhibit a desire to isolate and study their victims’ psyches. But the fabled creature from Buddhist and Hindu mythology predates Jennifer Kent’s movie, illustrating how loneliness can affect people all throughout the world.

The movie portrays how Black and Brown people might feel alienated in a predominantly white environment, which can result in assimilation. Sam, for example, no longer wants to use her Indian name; she prefers Tamira’s company over that of microaggressive white youngsters; she no longer frequently uses Hindi; and she no longer invites guests over to her house. These choices caused her to disagree with her orthodox mother, leading to the normal conflict between parents and first-generation Americans.

One wishes Dutta had emphasized assimilation more, more closely like Remi Weekes’ “His House,” another horror film with a strong immigrant theme.

There are various indications that Dutta intends to go in that direction: We discover that the monster may have its beginnings in India and that it has been transferred amongst several Indian families, people who likewise experience social isolation. But Dutta is too preoccupied with creating an unconvincing suburban teen tale.

Sam wants to fit in mostly for social reasons, as does every other teen, but especially someone who is worried about the cultural ramifications of being different. But we never see the effects on Sam at school when one of her adolescent friends is killed in front of her. She simply keeps attending class. These pearl-clutching white individuals are most definitely not looking for any solutions, especially in a neighborhood where Brown people are feared.

There are no police officers present, the child’s parents are not reaching out, and Sam has never actually confronted anyone in this small town. Simply said, it is illogical. Instead of depending on the fundamental building elements stolen from other, superior movies, you must keep audiences in the context of an adolescent movie.

The use of close-ups by Dutta and cinematographer Matthew Lynn, which adds an immersive element, as well as their fondness of Spike Lee’s double dolly shot, restricts the viewer as well. However, they use the technique three times instead of holding off until a crucial point, each time failing to accurately convey Sam’s inner turmoil.

The rudimentary sound design and poor match cuts that were intended to evoke fear also fail to impress. The last freakout, a confrontation between Sam and the creature in a cellar, drags on for much too long and loses momentum as Dutta searches for a way to a sequel.

It should have been possible to take advantage of many rich opportunities while telling an Indian-American horror story, especially one that is situated in a suburb. “It Lives Inside” is only average on the outside due to serious flaws in the plot, concepts, and suspense.

Currently showing in cinemas.


Leave a Comment